![]() We observed a number of branded products being released under a custom product license, while making the underlying source code available to the community under an open source license. We wanted to deliver a Microsoft branded product, built on top of an open source code base that the community could explore and contribute to. ![]() When we set out to open source our code base, we looked for common practices to emulate for our scenario. In that issue, a vscode developer explains: To learn why Visual Studio Code, the product, has a different license than vscode, the open source GitHub repository, see issue #60 for a detailed explanation. Why does Visual Studio Code have a different license than the vscode GitHub repository? This is explicitly addressed in the Visual Studio Code FAQ: Is it appropriate (within the norms of the open source community) for Microsoft to brand their proprietary-licensed binary as "Open Source" since it is based on a fully-buildable open source code base? Is there a well-known business reason why Microsoft would offer the binary and source under such vastly different licenses? It could be possible that I'm not understanding something here, but I was surprised to know VS code had different license for product and scource. I quickly looked up a couple of popular open source editors to find that they are released under one MIT license (Product and sc).Ītom is MIT licensed and the source is freely available from the atom/atom repository.īrackets is released under the MIT License It seems that the product is released under a different license and the source code is published under MIT license. In doing so, you must comply with any technical limitations in the software that only allow you to use it in certain ways. Unless applicable law gives you more rights despite this limitation, you may use the software only as expressly permitted in this agreement. This agreement only gives you some rights to use the software. ![]() ![]() Microsoft has also integrated theme support, with easy testing using special URLs - for example, opening v/theme/sdras.night-owl takes you to VS Code with the Night Owl theme installed.I have been using MS VS Code since a while now and I am I really loving it.Īlthough the other day I was having a discussion regarding editors with my mentor where he pointed to me this. Luna Paint Image Editor and GitHub Issue Notebooks are two examples of extensions that work in VS Code on the web. Most extensions don't work right now, because they need to be updated to run as web extensions that don't rely on Node.js code or local executables. This also means you can run Visual Studio Code on Chromebooks without enabling Linux app support, or older Chromebooks that never received Linux support in the first place.Įven though this is an impressive port, Visual Studio Code on the web has a few limitations. "With the availability of v," the Visual Studio Code team said in the blog post, we begin to finally realize our original vision of building a development tool that can run fully serverless in the browser." Importantly, this allows Visual Studio Code to run on iPads and Android tablets for the first time, or in environments where installing desktop software is limited or blocked (like corporate or educational environments). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |